Jump to content
Range Finder Forum (dot NET)
CameraQuest

Fuji Rumor - Medium Format less than Hassy

Recommended Posts

maybe Photokina, intro with 3 lenses, 50MP CMOS
lots less than the Hassy XD1

[url]http://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-medium-format-more-affordable-than-hasselblad-x1d/[/url]

time, eh Photokina, will tell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Makes sense. Fuji has built some fantastic MF film cameras, including the GW690III that I have been using. So this would be a natural progression.
Better than the crop sensor cameras they have that have had many longing for more. Now this would be a lot more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did Fuji fall out with Hasselblad? What will that mean for the H series?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
considering the xpro2 is 2000 cad$, im guessing Fuji's MF will be 3-4K.
if it is, i might be cery tempted on getting one.

tbh brilliant move by fuji investing on aps-c and then skipping FF and providing MF instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='taemo']considering the xpro2 is 2000 cad$, im guessing Fuji's MF will be 3-4K.
[/QUOTE]

It will be more - medium format systems are a much smaller niche, with high demands on service that have to be factored in, and Fuji are not really that much cheaper at production than Hasselblad (FWIW, for Hasselblad the XD1 indeed is a comeback as a camera manufacturer, after selling Fuji cameras for 15 years - and while Fuji sold the H series under their own brand domestically, the prices were not that far off the Hasselblad ones).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='CameraQuest']maybe Photokina, intro with 3 lenses, 50MP CMOS
lots less than the Hassy XD1

[url]http://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-medium-format-more-affordable-than-hasselblad-x1d/[/url]

time, eh Photokina, will tell[/QUOTE]

I met with a Fuji rep a few days ago - he said that "he would hold off on an X-Pro2 if it were [him]". He said he couldn't tell me what "it" is, only what it isn't. So I 20-questions'd my way to roughly the specs stated here. He also said it would be announced in Fall.

I'm intrigued, but based on the other stuff I gathered it will be built more like an SLR than an RF. So, unless I'm just totally blown away, I doubt it will be something I pick up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't see Canon and Nikon letting this happen without offering an alternative of their own. They do seem very locked into the 35mm DSLR train of thought but you never know!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please, wake me up when someone makes a 6x9cm mirrorless with 1Giga pixel resolution, so that I can use it instead of my scanner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mfogiel']Please, wake me up when someone makes a 6x9cm mirrorless with 1Giga pixel resolution, so that I can use it instead of my scanner.[/QUOTE]



Wake me up so I can use it for street photography :-p



[url]www.stillthrill.com[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Keith']I can't see Canon and Nikon letting this happen without offering an alternative of their own. [/QUOTE]

They did not offer any camera upward of photojournalism back in the film days, leaving the entire pro market to others - which appears to have stuck with them. Even though the lack of alternatives had them grow into the pro market in the past decade, they still do not even make a dedicated professional (non-PJ, non-handheld, studio biased) camera. So that obviously is no market that matters to them financially. I guess the entire pro market might be unprofitable relative to their consumer DSLR business - and while PJ cameras are reputation building among consumers and hence profitable even if they often are supposed to sell at a loss, they might well be right in not expecting similar effects from (almost invisible) studio cameras.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems like a rumor of a rumor of a camera that [I]may[/I] possibly be announced later in the year... :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It will still be too expensive for me. Considering how many FF 35mm cameras still top the $3000 mark, I can't see this camera being less than $6000 or so. Additionally, these medium format sensors aren't that huge. I'd love to see a 6x6cm sensor in one of these bodies... but I guess we are still many years away from this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the 645z body is 7k usd$ so yes this fuji might be (imo) 5-6k, wishful thinking is 3-4 bit highly doubt it at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='sevo']They did not offer any camera upward of photojournalism back in the film days, leaving the entire pro market to others - which appears to have stuck with them. Even though the lack of alternatives had them grow into the pro market in the past decade, they still do not even make a dedicated professional (non-PJ, non-handheld, studio biased) camera. So that obviously is no market that matters to them financially. I guess the entire pro market might be unprofitable relative to their consumer DSLR business - and while PJ cameras are reputation building among consumers and hence profitable even if they often are supposed to sell at a loss, they might well be right in not expecting similar effects from (almost invisible) studio cameras.[/QUOTE]

Nikon did make a wide range of LF glass a few years back. :cool:

B2 (:->

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am FIRMLY in the believe it when I see it camp. Not that I wouldn't think it's great. Medium format needs a resurgence beyond the ultra-high end. Something Pentax doesn't get enough credit for IMO... No way this will cost less than $6k though. There was a rumor that the 50mp CMOS ALONE is $4k.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The sensor alone is $4k if I'm not mistaken. If anything comes of this rumor then my guess is it'll be around the 645Z price range. I think they lowest price they'd be able to go for just the body is $6k.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='BillBingham2']Nikon did make a wide range of LF glass a few years back. [/QUOTE]

Not a camera, though, and actively marketing recently developed LF lenses only happened for a few years between 85 and 90 - before that they had been a OEM only, and after that they ceased to present anything new and fell back behind Schneider and Rodenstock again...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='coelacanth']My prediction: $5,995 for the body, $1,695 - $2,495 range for standard primes.[/QUOTE]

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a249/Desmolicious/pain_zpsdxow7lx8.jpg[/IMG]

for my wallet that is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='sevo']Not a camera, though, and actively marketing recently developed LF lenses only happened for a few years between 85 and 90 - before that they had been a OEM only, and after that they ceased to present anything new and fell back behind Schneider and Rodenstock again...[/QUOTE]

Not a large enough market. I'm sure there are folks like me who are have a LF camera from over 50 years ago that does everything I need.

I'm wondering if there is a market for a reasonable resolution but full 4x5 frame digital back. If larger pixels are important what about a 24MP back? Perhaps a 2 1/2 x 3 1/2 back breathing life into this old baby graphics.

B2 (;->

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='BillBingham2']Not a large enough market. I'm sure there are folks like me who are have a LF camera from over 50 years ago that does everything I need.

I'm wondering if there is a market for a reasonable resolution but full 4x5 frame digital back. If larger pixels are important what about a 24MP back? Perhaps a 2 1/2 x 3 1/2 back breathing life into this old baby graphics.

B2 (;->[/QUOTE]

Check these out [url]http://www.largesense.com/[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='BillBingham2']I'm wondering if there is a market for a reasonable resolution but full 4x5 frame digital back. If larger pixels are important what about a 24MP back? Perhaps a 2 1/2 x 3 1/2 back breathing life into this old baby graphics.

B2 (;->[/QUOTE]

That's almost discrete electronics these days :D Dalsa made a 70mmx70mm sensor years ago, they even stopped offereing it. Larger sensors than that have been made for scientific purposes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='sevo'], they still do not even make a dedicated professional (non-PJ, non-handheld, studio biased) camera. So that obviously is no market that matters to them financially. I guess the entire pro market might be unprofitable relative to their consumer DSLR business - and while PJ cameras are reputation building among consumers and hence profitable even if they often are supposed to sell at a loss, they might well be right in not expecting similar effects from (almost invisible) studio cameras.[/QUOTE]

I'm not quite sure what you're wanting from them here?

Are you meaning they don't make a Medium Format body?

Because I'm pretty sure they all have tripod mounts, so they don't have to be handheld, or used for photojournalism.

In the cases of the 5DS/5DSR/D800e I'd say that using a tripod almost becomes a neccesity. In the case of the Canons, the limited ISO range really marks them out as aimed at Studio use, and of course for many years most of them have tethered if that kind of thing is desirable.

Canon is apparently working on a Medium Format option, I'm sure Nikon is/has looked into it (I don't follow).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='brennanphotoguy']Check these out [url]http://www.largesense.com/[/url][/QUOTE]

Very cool, VERY VERY COOL!

Gotta keep my eye on them.

While I like the size of a baby, I already own a couple of 4x5s (Kodak View, Crown Graphic, and a Graflex SLR of sorts) that would be FUN.

Have a safe happy and fun 4th.

Thanks for sharing.

B2 (;->

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×